اهمیت عامل نقدشوندگی در توضیح مازاد بازده سهام: شواهد جدید از بورس اوراق بهادار تهران

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار گروه حسابداری دانشکدۀ مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد فیروزکوه، فیروزکوه، ایران

2 کارشناس‎ارشد حسابداری، دانشکدۀ مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد فیروزکوه، فیروزکوه، ایران

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر، نقش عامل نقدشوندگی را در توضیح مازاد بازده سهام شرکت‌های بورس تهران بررسی می‌کند. نتایج برازش مدل قیمت‌گذاری دارایی سرمایه‌ای، مدل دوعاملی لیو (2006)، مدل سه‎عاملی فاما و فرنچ (1993) و مدل چهارعاملی (صرف نقدشوندگی به‎علاوۀ سه عامل فاما و فرنچ) بر هشت پورتفوی ساخته‎شده بر مبنای اندازه، نسبت ارزش دفتری به بازار و نقدشوندگی، نشان می‌دهد مدل دوعاملی لیو توضیح بهتری از مدل قیمت‌گذاری دارایی سرمایه‌ای دارد؛ اما در مقایسه با مدل سه‎عاملی فاما و فرنچ توان توضیح بیشتری ندارد. با افزودن صرف نقدشوندگی به مدل سه‎عاملی فاما و فرنچ، توان توضیحی افزایش شایان توجهی می‌یابد که نشان می‌دهد چهار عامل بازار، اندازه، ارزش و نقدشوندگی در تبیین بازده سهام مؤثرند. نتایج به‎دست‎آمده در برابر تحلیل‌های حساسیت پایدارند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The role of liquidity factor in explaining the stock returns: New evidence from Tehran Stock Exchange

نویسندگان [English]

  • Abdolreza Talaneh 1
  • Meynoosh Hosseini 2
1 Associate Professor, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Islamic Azad University, Firoozkuh Branch, Firoozkuh, Iran
2 MSc., Faculty of Management and Accounting, Islamic Azad University, Firoozkuh Branch, Firoozkuh, Iran
چکیده [English]

This paper examines the role of liquidity factor in explaining the cross-section of stock returns of firms listed on Tehran Stock Exchange. The regression results of CAPM, Liu's two-factor model, the Fama-French three-factor model, and a Four-factor model in eight portfolios formed by Size, B/M Ratio, and Liquidity show that the two-factor (market and liquidity) model outperforms the CAPM in  explaining the cross-section of stock returns but not the Fama-French three-factor model. Adding liquidity premium to Fama-French three-factor model notably improves the adjusted R square of the model implying that all four factors of market, size, value, and liquidity play a significant role in explaining stock returns. The results are robust to sensitivity analyses for up and down market conditions and seasonal behavior.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Fama-French three-factor model
  • liquidity
  • Liu's two-factor model
Abbasi, E. & Ghezeljeh, Gh. (2012). Examining Fama-French three-factor model in explaining portfolios' returns. Journal of accounting knowledge, 4(11): 161-180. (in Persian)
Amihud, Y. (2002). Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects. Journal of Financial Markets, 5 (1): 31–56.
Amihud, Y. & Mendelson, H. (1986). Asset pricing and the bid-ask spread. Journal of Financial Economics, 17(2): 223–249.
Banz, Rolf, W. (1981). The Relationship between Return and Market Value of Common Stocks. Journal of Financial Economics, 9(1): 3-18.
Bartholdy, J. & Peare, P. (2005). Estimation of expected return: CAPM vs. Fama and French. International Review of Financial Analysis, 14(4): 407-427.
Basu, S. (1977). Investment Performance of Common Stocks in Relation to Their Price-Earnings Ratios: A Test of the Efficient Market Hypothesis. Journal of Finance, 32(3): 663-682.
Basu, S. (1983). The Relationship between Earnings Yield, Market Value, and Return for NYSE Common Stocks: Further Evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 12(1): 129-156.
Bhandari, L. C. (1988). Debt /equity ratio and expected common stock returns: Empirical evidence. The Journal of Finance, 43(2): 507–528.
Carhart, M. M. (1997). On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance. Journal of Finance, 52(1): 57–82.
Chan, K. C., Hamao, Y. & Lakonishok, J. (1991). Fundamentals and Stock Returns in Japan. Journal of Finance, 46 (5): 1739–1789.
Chen, N.F. & Reymond, K. (1989). Expected returns and the bid-ask spread. Working paper, University of Chicago.
Chordia, T., Roll, R. & Subrahmanyam, A. (2000). Commonality in liquidity. Journal of Financial Economics, 56(1): 3–28.
Chui, A. & Wei, K. C. (1998). Book-to-Market, Firm Size and the Turn-of-the-Year Effect: Evidence from Pacific–Basin Emerging Markets. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 6 (3/4): 275–293.
Datar, V., Naik, N. & Radcliffe, R. (1998). Liquidity and asset returns: an alternative test. Journal of Financial Markets, 1(2): 203-220.
Easley, D., Hvidkjaer, S. & O’Hara, M. (2004). Factoring information into returns. Working Paper. Cornell University.
Eslami Bidgholi, GH. & Khojasteh, M.A. (2008). Improving portfolio performance based on risk adjusted return in capital productivity oriented investments. Journal of financial research, 9(4): 3-21. (in Persian)
Fama, E.F. & French, K.R. (1993). Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33 (1): 3-56.
Fama, E. F. (1998). Market efficiency, long-term returns, and behavioral finance. Journal of Financial Economics, 49(3): 283-306.
Fama, E. F. & French, K.R. (1996). Multifactor Explanations of Asset Pricing Anomalies, Journal of Finance, 51(1): 55–84.
Forooghi, D., Frahmand, SH. & Ebrahimi, M. (2011). The relation between liquidity and performance of firms listed at Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Securities and Exchange, 4(15): 125-143. (in Persian)
Foster, K.R. & Kharazi, A. (2008). Contrarian and Momentum Returns on Iran's Tehran Stock Exchange. The Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money, 18(1): 16-30.
Ghalibaf Asl, H. & Eghbali, E. (2013). Examining liquidity premium and two-factor model in Tehran Stock Exchange. Quantitative studies in management, 4(4): 1-22. (in Persian)
Ghalibaf Asl, H. & Izadi, M. (2014). The relation between risk and return in Tehran Stock Exchange: momentum effect and liquidity risk. Monetary and Financial Economy, New series, 21(7): 84-104. (in Persian)
Ghalibaf Asl, H. & Karimi, M. (2012). Pricing of liquidity, size, value, and market risk premiums in Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Securities and Exchange, 5(17): 85-105. (in Persian)
Ghalibaf Asl, H., Shams, Sh. & Sadehvand, M. J. (2010). Examining the abnormal returns on price and earnings momentum in Tehran Stock Exchange. The Iranian Accounting and Auditing Review, 17(61): 99-116. (in Persian)
Hashemi, S. A., Qajavand, Z. & Qajavand, S. (2013). The effects of different levels of liquidity measures on stock returns premium using a four-factor model. Journal of Finance and asset management. 1(2): 69-86.
(in Persian)
Herrera, M. J. & Lockwood, L. J. (1994). The Size Effect in the Mexican Stock Market. Journal of Banking and Finance, 18(4): 621-632.
Huberman, G. & Halka, D. (2001). Systematic liquidity. Journal of Financial Research, 24(2): 161–178.
Hubinette, N. & Jonsson, G. (2011). An Alternative Four-Factor Model. Master Thesis in Finance Stockholm School of Economics.
Jaff, J., Keim, D. B. & Westerfied, R.(1989). Earnings Yields, Market Values, and Stock Returns. Journal of Finance, 44(1): 135-348.
Jegadeesh, N. & Titman, S. (1993). Returns to buying winners and selling losers: implications for stock market efficiency. Journal of Finance, 48(1): 65–91.
L’Her, J., Masmoudi, T. & Suret, J. (2004). Evidence to Support the Four-Factor Pricing Model from the Canadian Stock Market. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 14(4): 313–328.
Lam, K.S.K., Li, F.K. & & So, S.M.S. (2009). On the Validity of the Augmented Fama-French Four-Factor Model. University of Macau.
Lee, C., Swaminathan, B. (2000). Price momentum and trading volume. Journal of Finance, 55(5): 2017–2069.
Liew, J. &Vassalou, M. (2000). Can Book-to-Market, Size and Momentum be Risk Factors that Predict Economic Growth? Journal of Financial Economics, 57(2): 221–245.
Liu, W. (2006). A liquidity augmented capital asset pricing model. Journal of Financial Economics, 82 (3): 631–671.
Lustig, H. (2001). The market price of aggregate risk and the wealth distribution. Unpublished working paper, University of Chicago (NBER).
Mehrani, S. & Rasaeian, A. (2009). The relation between liquidity measures and annual stock returns in Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Accounting, 1(1):217-230. (in Persian)
Mojtahedzadeh, V. & Tarami, M. (2006). Examining Fama-French three- factor model in explaining stock returns in Tehran Stock Exchange. The message of Management. Nos. 17, 18: 109-132. (in Persian)
Newey, W. & West, K. (1987). A simple, positive semi-definite heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica, 55(3): 703–708.
O’Brien, M., Brailsford, T. & Gaunt, C. (2010). Interaction of size, book-to-market and momentum effects in Australia. Accounting and Finance, 50(1): 197–219.
Pastor, L. & Stambaugh, R. (2003). Liquidity risk and expected stock returns. Journal of Political Economy, 111(3): 642–685.
Reinganum, M. R. (1981). Misspecification of Capital Asset Pricing: Empirical Anomalies based on Earnings’ Yields and Market Values. Journal of Financial Economics, 9(1): 19-46.
Reinganum, M. R. (1982). A Direct Test of Roll’s Conjecture on the Firm Size Effect. Journal of Finance, 37(1): 27–35.
Rosenberg, B., Reid, K. & Lanstein, R. (1985). Persuasive Evidence of Market Inefficiency. Journal of Portfolio Management, 11(3): 9–16.
Rostami, M. & Rezaee Moqaddam, A. (2013). A survey of long-term return on IPOs using Fama-French model, liquidity and leverage. Management researches in Iran. 17(3): 113-127. (in Persian)
Sadeqi Sharif, S. J., Talaneh, A. & Askari Rad, H. (2013). Momentum Factor Effect on the Explanatory Power of Fama-French Three-Factor Model: Evidence from Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of accounting knowledge, 4(12): 59-88. (in Persian)
Sadka, R. (2006). Momentum and post-earnings-announcement drift anomalies: The role of liquidity risk. Journal of Financial Economics, 80(2): 309–349.
Yahyazadehfar, M. & Khoramdin, J. (2008). The role of liquidity factors and iliquidity risk in explaining stock returns in Tehran Stock Exchange. The Iranian Accounting and Auditing Review, 15(53): 101-118. (in Persian)
Yahyazadehfar, M., Shams, Sh. & Larimi, S. J. (2010). The relation between liquidity an stock returns in Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Financial Researches, 12 (29): 111-128. (in Persian)