Are Audit Firm Revenues Indicators of Their Audit Quality?

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Prof., Department of Accounting, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Prof., Department of Accounting, Faculty of Accounting and Financial Sciences, College of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

3 Ph.D., Department of Accounting, Faculty of Accounting and Financial Sciences, College of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

10.22059/acctgrev.2022.336150.1008637

Abstract

Objective
The objective of financial statements is to provide useful information to users for making economic decisions. High-quality information improves resource allocation and enhances market efficiency. The reliability and quality of financial statements are verified by auditors. In other words, auditors enhance financial reporting quality through high-quality audit services. Previous research shows that there is no reliable proxy for evaluating the quality of audit services. In the literature, auditor size (due to the independence and competence that a larger size offers) is commonly used as a proxy for audit quality. However, some studies have questioned this theory, known as the "auditor size theory." Audit firm size is primarily characterized by Big N membership. Since Big N firms have not operated in Iran since the Islamic Revolution in 1979, Iranian researchers lack a mechanism to distinguish high-quality auditors. This study uses audit firm revenue as a proxy for auditor size and aims to test whether the revenues of audit firms in Iran are reliable indicators of the quality of their work.
Methods
The data from companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange between 2015 and 2020 have been used. To measure audit quality, seven different criteria have been employed: type of audit opinion, number of clauses and non-recurring clauses in the audit report, audit failure, accrual management, accrual quality, and accounting conservatism. This study focuses only on private TAFs because the Iranian Audit Organization (IAO) and Mofid Raahbar Audit Firm (MRAF), as state audit firms, have a monopolistic market share in auditing state-owned enterprises. Therefore, client firms audited by the IAO and MRAF have been excluded. In total, the final sample of this study includes 1,188 firm-year observations.
Results
Although high-revenue audit firms are more likely to issue qualified audit opinions and include more clauses (as well as more non-recurring clauses) in the audit report, auditors' revenue is not significantly associated with accrual quality, earnings management, audit failure, or conservatism.
Conclusion
Although high-revenue auditors tend to issue qualified audit opinions and include more clauses in their reports, firms' revenues are not significantly associated with other proxies, such as the number of non-recurring clauses in the audit report, audit failure, accrual management, accrual quality, and accounting conservatism. As a result, audit firms' revenues are not reliable indicators of their audit quality. Therefore, the auditor size theory is not supported in Iran. In other words, this study shows that audit fees do not affect the quality of services provided by auditors, possibly due to the unique characteristics of the Iranian audit market. The findings of this study offer valuable insights for clients, policymakers, and academics.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

 
Abad Diaz, D., Sánchez Ballesta, J. & Yagüe, J. (2017). Audit Opinions and Information Asymmetry in the Stock Market. Journal of Accounting and Finance, 57(2), 565-595.
Abid, A., Shaique, M., Anwar ul Haq, M. (2018). Do Big Four Auditors Always Provide Higher Audit Quality? Evidence from Pakistan. International Journal of Financial Studies, 6(2), 1-22.
Alareeni, B.A. (2019). The associations between audit firm attributes and audit quality-specific indicators: A meta-analysis. Managerial Auditing Journal, 34 (1), 6-43.
Alavi Tabari, S.H. & HajiMoradkhani, H. (2015). Relationship between audit quality and stick liquidity. The Financial Accounting and Auditing Researches, 7(27), 92-110. (in Persian)
Anthony, J. H. & Ramesh, K. (1992). Association between accounting performance measures and stock prices: A test of the life cycle hypothesis. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 15, 203–227.
Bae, G. S. & Lee, J. E. (2013). Does Audit Firm Size Matter? The Effect of Audit Firm Size Measured by Audit Firm Revenues, Number of Offices, and Professional Headcounts on Audit Quality and Audit Fees. The Effect of Audit Firm Size Measured by Audit Firm Revenues, Number of Offices, and Professional Headcounts on Audit Quality and Audit Fees (July 22, 2013). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2344052.
Ball, R. & Shivakumar, L. (2005). Earnings Quality in Uk Private Firms: Comparative Loss Recognition Timeliness. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 83-128.
Balsam, S., Krishnan, J. & Yang, J. (2003). Auditor Industry Specialization and Earnings Quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 22 (2), 71–97.
Becker, C., Defond, M., Jiambavlo, J. & Subramanyam, K. (1998). The Effect of Audit Quality on Earnings Management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15(1), 1-24.
Berglund, N.R., Eshleman, J.D. & Guo, P. (2018). Auditor Size and Going Concern Reporting. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 37(2), 1-25.
Cameran, M., Ditillo, A. & Pettinicchio, A. (2018). Audit team attributes matter: How diversity affects audit quality. European Accounting Review, 27(4), 595–621.
Cesari, A.D., and Huang-Meier, W. (2015). Dividend changes and stock price informativeness. Journal of Corporate Finance, 35, 1-17.
Chan, K.H., Lin, K.Z. & Mo, P.L. (2006). A Political–economic Analysis of Auditor Reporting and Auditor Switches. Review of Accounting Studies, 11, 21–48.
Chaney, P.K., Jeter, D.C. & Shivakumar, L. (2004). Self-Selection of Auditors and Audit Pricing in Private Firms. The Accounting Review, 79 (1), 51–72.
Chen, H., Chen, J.Z., Lobo, G.J. & Wang, Y. (2011). Effects of Audit Quality on Earnings Management and Cost of Equity Capital: Evidence from China. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28 (3), 892–925.
Chen, Y.S., Hsu, J., Huang, M.T. & Yang, P.S. (2013). Quality, Size, and Performance of Audit Firms. The International Journal of Business and Finance Research, 7(5), 89-105.
Chersan, I-C. (2019). Audit Quality and Several of its Determinants. Journal of Audit Financiar, 1(17), 93-115.
Choi, J. H., Kim, J. B., Liu, X. & Simunic, D. A. (2008), Audit Pricing, Legal Liability Regimes, and Big 4 Premiums: Theory and Cross‐country Evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25, 55-99.
Choi, J.H., Kim, C., Kim, J.B. & Zang, Y. (2010). Audit Office Size, Audit Quality, and Audit Pricing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 29(1), 73-97.
Craswell, A.T., Francis, J.R. & Taylor, S. (1995). Auditor brand name reputations and industry specializations. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20(3), 297-322.
Datar, S.M., Feltham, G.A & Hughes, J.S. (1991). The Role of Audits and Audit Quality in Valuing New Issues. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 14 (1), 3–49.
DeAngelo, L. (1981). Auditor Size and Audit Quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3, 297−322.
Dechow, P. & Dichev, I. (2002). The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review, 77, 35–59.
DeFond, M. L., Wong, T. J. & Li, S. H. (2000). The impact of improved auditor independence on audit market concentration in China. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 28, 269–305.
Defond, M., Eriksen, D.H. & Zhang, J. (2017). Comment and Response to “Do Client Characteristics Really Drive the Big N Audit Quality Effect? New Evidence from Propensity Score Matching”. Management Science, 63(11), 3531-3997.
Defond, M. & Zhang, J. (2014). A Review of Archival Auditing Research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58, 275-326.
Ding, Y., Zhang, H. & Zhang, J. (2007). Private vs. state ownership and earnings management: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Corporate Governance, 15, 223–238.
El-Dyasty, M.A. & Elamer, A.A. (2020). The effect of auditor type on audit quality in emerging markets: Evidence from Egypt. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 29(1), 4-66.
Eshleman, J.D. & Guo, P. (2014). Do Big 4 Auditors Provide Higher Audit Quality after Controlling for the Endogenous Choice of Auditor? Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 33 (4), 197-219.
Farber, D. (2005). Restoring Trust after Fraud: Does Corporate Governance Matter? The Accounting Review, 80(2), 539-561.
Francis, J.R. (2011). A Framework for Understanding and Researching Audit Quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(2), 125-152.
Francis, J.R. & Yu, M.D. (2009). Big 4 Office Size and Audit Quality. The Accounting Review, 84(5), 1521-1552.
Francis, J.R., Edward, L., Maydew, L. & Charles Sparks, H. (1999). The Role of Big 6 Auditors in the Credible Reporting of Accruals. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 18(2), 17-34.
Francis, J.R. & Wang, D. (2008). The Joint Effect of Investor Protection and Big 4 Audits on Earnings Quality around the World. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(1), 157–191.
Gul, F.A., Sami, H. & Zhou, H. (2009). Auditor disaffiliation program in China and auditor independence. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 28(1), 29–51.
HassasYeganeh, Y. & Azinfar, K. (2010). Relationship between Audit Quality and Auditor Size. Accounting and Auditing Review, 17(3), 85-98. (in Persian)
Hesarzadeh, R. (2022). The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Regulatory Comment Letters: Evidence from Iran. Spanish Accounting Review, 25(1), 58-75.
Huang, T.C., Lin, Y.H. & Hairston, S. (2019). Is there an association between accounting firm ranks and audit quality? An examination of the top 100 accounting firms in China. International Journal of Auditing, 2(23), 204-230.
IASB (2008). Exposure Draft on an improved Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting: The Objective of Financial Reporting and Qualitative Characteristics of Decision-useful Financial Reporting Information. London.
Johnson, L. E., Davies, S. P. & Freeman, R. J. (2002). The effect of seasonal variations in auditor workload on local government audit fees and audit delay. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 21, 395–422.
Khurana, I. & Raman. K. (2004), Litigation Risk and the Financial Reporting Credibility of Big 4 versus non-Big 4 Audits: Evidence from Anglo-American Countries. The Accounting Review, 79(2), 473-495.
Kim, J.B., Chung, R. & Firth, M. (2003). Auditor conservatism, asymmetric monitoring, and earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 20(2), 323-359.
Kothari, S.P., Leone, A.J. & Wasley, C. (2005). Performance-Matched Discretionary Accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 163-197.
Lawrence, A., Minutti-Meza, M. & Zhang, P. (2011). Can Big 4 versus non-Big 4 Difference in Audit-Quality Proxies Be Attributed to Client Characteristics. The Accounting Review, 86 (1), 259-286.
Lennox, C. & Pittman, J. (2010). Auditing the auditors: Evidence on the recent reforms to the external monitoring of audit firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 49, 84-103.
Li, C., Song, F.M. & Wong, S.M.L. (2008). A Continuous Relation between Audit Firm Size and Audit Opinions: Evidence from China. International Journal of Auditing, 12(2), 111–127.
Lin, Z.J., Liu, M. & Wang, Z. (2008). Market Implications of the Audit Quality and Auditor Switches: Evidence from China. Journal of International Financial Management Accounting, 20(1), 35-78.
Macve, R. (2020). Perspectives from mainland China, Hong Kong and the UK on the development of China auditing firms: implications and a research agenda. Accounting and Business Research, 50(7), 641-692. DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2020.1736494
Mashayekhi, B. & Mashayekh, S. (2008). Development of accounting in Iran. The International Journal of Accounting, 43(1), 66-86.
McNichols, M. F. (2000). Research design issues in earnings management studies. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 19, 313–345.
Mehrani, S., Moradi, M., Nakhaei, M. & Motmaen, M. (2013). The Role of Auditor Characteristics in Earnings Quality. Journal of Financial Accounting Research, 5(2), 93-108. (in Persian)
Moayedi, V. & Aminfard, M. (2012). Iran`s post war financial system. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Managemnt, 5(3), 264-281.        
Mohammadrezaei, F. & Yahyaee, M. (2016). Restatement in financial statements: investigating SEO classification of auditors. Journal of Audit Science, 16(64), 171-188. (in Persian)
Mohammadrezaei, F. & Faraji, O. (2019). The Dilemma of Audit Quality Measuring in Archival Studies: Critiques and Suggestions for Iran’s Research Setting. Accounting and Auditing Review, 26(1), 87-122. (in Persian)
Mohammadrezaei, F. & Mehrabanpour, M. (2016). Audit Firms Ranking and Audit Opinions: Evidence from Iran. Journal of Management Accounting and Auditing Knowledge, 5(17), 65-77. (in Persian)
MohammadRezaei, F., Mohd Saleh, N. & Ahmed, K. (2018). Audit Firm Ranking, Audit Quality and Audit Fees: Examining Conflicting Price Discrimination Views. The International Journal of Accounting, 53(4), 295-313.
MohammadRezaei, F., Mohd-Saleh, N., Jaffar, R. & Sabri, M.S. (2016). The effects of audit market liberalization and auditor type on audit opinions: The Iranian experience. International Journal of Auditing, 20(1), 87-100.
Mohammadrezaei, F. & YaghoubNejad, A. (2016). Auditor size and audit quality: Theorical critique, method critique and suggestions. The Financial Accounting and Auditing Researches, 9(34), 31-59. (in Persian)
Moradi, M., Salehi, M. & Shirdel, J. (2011). An Investigation of the Relationship between Audit Firm Size and Earning Management in Quoted Companies in Tehran Stock Exchange. African Journal of Business Management, 5 (8), 3345-3353.
Nonahal Nahr, A., Jabbarzadeh Kangarluei, S., Pourkarim, Y. (2010). The Relationship between Auditor Quality and Accrual Reliability. Accounting and Auditing Review, 17(3), 55-70.
Palmrose, Z.V. (1988). Audit Fee and Auditor Size: Further Evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 24(1), 97-110.
Rahmani, H. & Talebnia, Gh. (2013). Relationship between auditor type and audit opinion with earning management proxy. The Financial Accounting and Auditing Researches, 5(19), 23-42. (in Persian)
Ramazan Ahmadi, M., Jamali, K. & Karamshahi, B. (2014). Economic consequences Qualified audit opinions on the listed companies in Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Management Accounting and Auditing Knowledge, 4, 67-76. (in Persian)
Rosenbaum, P. & Rubin, D. (1983). The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55.
Semba, H.D. & Kato, R. (2019). Does Big N matter for audit quality? Evidence from Japan. Asian Review of Accounting, 27(1), 2-28.
Sundgren, S. (2009). Perceived audit quality, modified audit opinions and the likelihood of liquidating bankruptcy among financially weak firms. International Journal of Auditing, 13, 203–221.
Teoh, S. H., Welch, I. & Wong, T. J. (1998). Earnings management and the long-run market performance of initial public offerings. Journal of Finance, 53, 1935–1974.
Trueman, B. & Titman, S. (1998). An explanation for accounting income smoothing. Journal of Accounting Research, 26 (1), 127-139.
US Treasury, (2008). Final Report of the Advisory Committee on the Auditing Profession to the USD epartment of the Treasury. The Department of theTreasury.
Wang, Q., Wong, T.J. & Xia, L. (2008). State ownership, the institutional environment, and auditor choice: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 46, 112-134.
Watts, R. & Zimmerman, J. (1981). Auditors and the determination of accounting standards. Working Paper. University of Rochester.
Xu, Y., Carson, E., Fargher, N. & Jiang, L. (2013). Responses by Australian Auditors to the Global Financial Crisis. Accounting and Finance, 53 (1), 301–338.
Zhan, J., Her, Y. W. & Chen, K. (2020). Audit quality and audit size: Evidence from auditor mergers in China. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 31(3), 170-184.
Accounting and Auditing Review
Volume 32, Issue 2
2025
Pages 253-283

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics