Accounting and Auditing Review

Accounting and Auditing Review

An Investigation of the Challenges and Solutions for Improving the Utilization of Emerging Technologies in the Auditing Profession

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
1 Associate Prof., Department of Accounting, Faculty of Social Sciences and Economic, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Assistant Prof., Department of Accounting, Faculty of Social Sciences and Economic, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran.
3 Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Accounting, Faculty of Social Sciences and Economic, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran.
10.22059/acctgrev.2026.414835.1009268
Abstract
Objective
This study aims to identify the challenges associated with the adoption of emerging technologies in Iran’s auditing profession and to propose solutions for facilitating their effective implementation. It seeks to provide a context-specific, experience-based perspective by examining experts’ views on the barriers and enabling factors that shape technological transformation in the auditing profession.
Methods
This interpretive study adopts an inductive approach and a cross-sectional time horizon, using a qualitative research design based on thematic analysis from a strategic perspective. Data were collected through three focus group sessions conducted in 2025 with audit firm partners and managers, representatives of the Audit Organization, university professors, industry experts, and members of the Information Technology Audit Scientific Association. Participants were selected using purposive sampling. The sessions were transcribed verbatim, and the data were analyzed using the six-step thematic analysis approach.
Results
The findings revealed that the challenges of technology adoption in auditing can be categorized into four main clusters. First, in the human capital dimension, the major challenges include a shortage of integrated audit and IT competencies, the absence of mandatory educational pathways, and insufficient educational resources and references. Second, in the data and information dimension, challenges include limited access to structured data, heterogeneity among corporate information systems, legal and security concerns regarding data exchange, the lack of standards and regulations for information access and security assurance, and regulators’ emphasis on maintaining physical and paper-based audit files. Third, at the infrastructure level, inadequate server and network capacity was identified as a key obstacle. Fourth, in the software dimension, reliance on inappropriate imported software, economic uncertainty for small and medium-sized audit firms, and sanctions and barriers to knowledge transfer were recognized as major constraints. To address these challenges, an actionable solution package was developed, including the design of layered educational pathways for data-driven skills and specialized certifications; the establishment of dual-specialty teams and facilitation of the recruitment of IT specialists in audit firms; the incorporation of technology adoption incentives into audit firm rankings; the development and updating of relevant standards; the revision of regulations concerning electronic documentation, with an emphasis on security and authenticity; the updating of quality control methods and review questionnaires based on new standards and IT risks; requiring companies to provide independent auditors with information and database access; the standardization of data extraction requirements across information systems; the development of domestic software solutions; the improvement of firms’ minimum technological infrastructure; ensuring integration between audit software and financial systems; and the design of a comprehensive digital transformation roadmap for the auditing profession.
Conclusion
The study concludes that successful technology-driven transformation in auditing requires the integrated strengthening of four key components: human capacity development, data standardization, operational infrastructure, and software advancement. The proposed framework can support the development of indigenous policies, regulatory guidelines, and data-driven educational programs for Iran’s auditing profession and sustainable future technological development initiatives.
Keywords
Subjects

References
Adnan Hammood, M., Piri, P. & Ashtab, A. (2025). Feasibility of Utilizing Advanced Artificial Intelligence Technologies to Improve Auditing Processes in the Country. Accounting and Auditing Review, 32(3), 535-559. (in Persian)
Afsaei, A. (2024). A Meta-Synthesis of Factors Affecting Technology Adoption in Auditing. Quarterly Journal of Accounting and Auditing Studies, 12(45), 79-108. (in Persian)
Alavi, S. K., Jafari, M., Nemati, A. & Darabi, R . (2024). The Optimal and Practical Model of Information Technology in Auditing with a Pragmatic Approach Abstract. Accounting and Auditing Studies, 13(50), 27-50. doi: 10.22034/iaas.2024.204873 (in Persian)
Allami, K. K. J., Almaqtari, F. A., Al-Hattami, H. M. & Sapra, R. (2024). Factors associated with the intention to use information technology in audit in Iraq. Information Discovery and Delivery, 52(2), 197-212.
Allee, K. D. & Glover, S. M. (2019). Continuous auditing and the current auditing standards: A misfit? Working Paper, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2), 77–101.
Brown-Liburd, H. & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2015). Big Data and audit evidence. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 12(1), 1-16.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13 (3), 319–340.
Ernst & Young. (2020). How EY Helix is transforming the audit through data analytics. EY Global.
Hemmatfar, M., Rezaei, A. & Karimi, M. (2010). Investigating Barriers to the Implementation of Electronic Auditing in the Supreme Audit Court of Iran. Quarterly Journal of Financial and Auditing Knowledge, 1(3), 125-148. (in Persian)
International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). (2023). International Standard on Auditing 315 (Revised 2021): Identifying and assessing the risks of material misstatement.
International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2019). ISO 21378:2019 Audit data collection.
KPMG. (2023). KPMG and Microsoft announce expanded alliance to transform the audit experience. KPMG International.
Krieger, F., Drews, P. & Velte, P. (2021). Explaining the adoption of advanced data analytics in audit: An integrated model. Journal of Information Systems, 35 (2), 69–89.
Kruger, R. A. & Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Mansouri, M. J., Karami, G. R. & Yazdani, H. R. (2024). Identifying key drivers influencing the future of auditing: A meta-synthesis approach. Accounting and Auditing Review, 31(2), 390–427. (in Persian)
Marfou, M., Bayazidi, P. & Salehpour, A. (2022). Organizational and Environmental Influences on the Adoption of Computer-Assisted Audit Tools and Techniques (CAATTs). Journal of Professional Auditing Research (Audit Research), 2(6), 130-148. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/999086/en (in Persian)
Mayor, T. (2019). Technology and new methods for database auditing. Journal of Information Systems Security, 15 (3), 45–62.
Monoko, S., Jones, A. & Brown, T. (2020). The use of technology in risk assessment and transaction testing. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 21 (3), 401–420.
Morshedipour, A., Dehnavi, M. & Moein al-Din, M. (2016). Economic Analysis of the Audit Services Market in Iran. Iranian Economic Research, 21(67), 161-189. (in Persian)
Nazarian, R. & Mozafari, F. (2024). Analyzing the Effective Dimensions of Emerging Technologies on the Accounting Profession: A Meta-synthesis. Accounting and Auditing Review, 31(4), 763-793. (in Persian)
Nsrah, M., Al-Haddad, L. & Fadhil, M. (2023). A review of computer-assisted audit tools and techniques (CAATTs) literature. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 19 (1), 1–25.
Pedrosa, I., Costa, C. J. & Aparicio, M. (2020). Challenges for auditors in the digital age: Data variety, volume, and system complexity. Journal of Business Research, 112, 500–512.
 PwC. (2023). PwC's audit transformation: Leveraging AI and cloud. PwC Global.
Rameshe, M., Maleki, M. H. & Soltanian, M. (2023). Presenting a framework for identifying key drivers affecting the future of auditing with a focus on Industry 4.0 technologies. Journal of Professional Auditing Research, 3(12), 8–37. (in Persian)
Razzaq, N., Zahedi, M. A., Shahbazi-Raz, H. & Koliwand, A. (2019). Roundtable: Transition to information technology-based auditing in Iran: Risks and solutions. Hesabdar-e Rasmi, 16(45), 15–33. (in Persian)
Saffar, M. & Kabaran Zadeh Ghadim, M. (2016). Identifying Barriers to Computerized Auditing in Iranian Government Organizations. Auditing Knowledge Quarterly, 16(63), 5-30. (in Persian)
Salari Abarghoei, M., Shahmoradi, N. & Taftiyan, A. (2026). Identifying and Prioritizing Determinants of Accountants' Professional Identity in the Digitalization Era: An Interpretive Structural Modeling Approach. Accounting and Auditing Review, 33(1), 87-127. (in Persian)
Salijeni, G., Samsonova-Taddei, A. & Turley, S. (2019). Understanding how audit firms leverage digital technologies. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 77, 1–15.
Taghavi, S. & Fakhari, M. (2023). Futures Studies of Emerging Technologies in the Iranian Financial Auditing Profession: Scenario Analysis Based on Delphi Method. Accounting and Auditing Studies, 11(42), 1-30. (in Persian)
Tornatzky, L. G. & Fleischer, M. (1990). The Processes of Technological Innovation. Lexington MA, Lexington Books.
Totoli, E., Silva, R. & Costa, F. (2022). Information technology as a routine in modern audit. International Journal of Auditing, 26 (2), 245–263.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B. & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27 (3), 425–478.
 Williams, S. P. (2021). Resistance to new technologies in financial professions. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 34 (2), 456–474.